If you only integrate updates with WinToolkit this kind of error shoudn't happen. Do you also integrate tweaks / drivers?

I answered here. But this info was already available both here at wincert forums and also at the MDL hotfix repository. Use the search funtion more often.

KB2823180 is WMF 3.0 and it's not integratable. Move it to the silent installers tab, and make sure you install before it .net 4.5

 

Also, all updates to it, make sure are installed after KB2823180 is installed (rename the hotfixes, put ''zzzz'' in front of them so they install last).

The link in the first post is for 656b.

Just tested it in x64 win7 VM and it works great! Thanks!

 

 

btw, 658b is out, but I don't think anyone would mind if you'd wait for the next beta build, as lately the dev / beta builds are very frequent...

A warning for the users of this addon. This needs .net 4.0, and it contains it. So if you integrate it with Win Toolkit, don't be amazed if a very old version of .net 4.0 is also installed on your pc

 

Highly DON'T recommend it!

2.1.6 is out. Hope again bug-free

Thanks!. And 657b is out, fixing another bugs.

 

Funny that after many years of no development, the author of the app keeps updating it weekly. Funny and encouraging, as I don't see a worthy alternative for this great app.

The major update I was talking about (653b) was out the same day you posted 649b. Now version 1.3.3.656b is out, fixing other bugs in the major release.

 

Question: Now that there are two different builds, one for x64, one for x86, do you plan on making two different addons?

 

Either way, I'm ready to test the new build in a couple of days, hope you'll have the time to update your addon

Neah, a newer release is said (by the author) to come out this week, fixing ALOT of bugs and introducing some cool features. This will be the last beta (followed by several RC-like builds) before a final release.

 

 

 

I am very excited about the next release...

All the features I had planned for the next major release have been implemented.
These include:

• Recent changes
• Run History
• First day of the week localization
• Many bug fixes and improvements
• x64 build

I am currently, and would expect to spend at least the next two weeks doing internal testing before releasing this.

Once this next beta release is stable (tested by the public) I will make it an official release.

 

So no biggie if we'll wait a little...

Question: Why does also IE - related updates / languagepacks have to go to the prerequisites?

 

If you keep insisting on having IE in the prerequisites, why not leaving (moving by default) only IE and IE10 prerequisites in that area? By not moving by default IE - related other updates / languagepacks, the problem everyone keeps talking about should be solved automatically.

I've added a right-click option where you can move updates to and from the prerequisites list.

 

Will this option be implemented soon? Or have you found a different solution for the languagepacks problem described in this thread?

 

People are recommending  earlier builds of your app for those having this issue, and I don't think you want this.

In my case it doesn't. I just can't download the files, not through IE, Chrome, Firefox, pause / restart, or other ways. Just cannot.

I can't download your stuff. See attached. It's not an ad-fly issue, please go back to mediafire or a-drive. The download gets stuck after downloading more than 50% of the file. I thought it was a temporary issue, but I get it for several days.

 

Again, never had issues with the ad-fly + mediafire or ad-fly + a-drive combos.

Of course. English is not my native language, so maybe sometimes I'm not finding the best ways to express myself... Thanks again for the info, and yes, your current default options for your installers seem great.

Thanks for the info... it was just a question. I thought it made smth else, smth more complex, too much trouble for just a defrag. Not to mention for SSD users out there...

 

Going to leave it default. Great job selecting those options.

I was intrigued to see in the description in the first post this...

 

 

Enable Optimization: OFF

 

I can say from experience that installing older versions that didn't have this option, Adobe Reader starts slower and ''behaves'' slower than with a newer build with that option. And this is very obvious on old hardware. Of course I cannot say that the optimization feature makes it run faster or it's just that Adobe Reader 10 is faster than version 7 / 8 / 9 / etc It's very likely however that this optimization feature scans / tests the system hardware capabilities and ''calibrates'' the app accordingly.

 

I can also see that in the guide you provided in the first post, this one, the author also recommends this optimization feature to be enabled.

 

Is your description wrong and actually optimization is turned on (although during the install process it pops up another screen that isn't present in yours), or you decided to turn it off for some reason? Thanks.

Sorry for the mix-up. And thanks for both the link and for also updating that aio installer

Question: you had somewhere (probably at ryanvm, I can't remember) a single installer with both updated roots and also revoked roots combined. It was great for xp + nlite... can you please make an updated installer for it and post it in the first post? Thanks

KB2805226 - important update for .net 4.5

However for the first build you've made, KB2574819 generated for you that RunOnce error. Maybe when integrated alongside some tweak or smth else from your usual build, it gives that error. Weird.

 

 

I also wasn't able to reproduce any error for KB2574819 / KB2592687 using my system / VM - looks like every Remote Desktop Protocol 8.0 related error is system bound (can appear only on some systems / configurations / situations).

I don't understand, both updates were installed as silent installers in your last two setups, or have you integrated to an offline image KB2574819?

For a free beer, of course I'll come!

 

 

Why don't you try moving both updates to the silent installer area and see if everything goes ok? Or have you tried that already and I didn't fully understand your last post?

Thank you very much! I don't use your installer as a silent one, but it's nice to have that options for people who do.

 

Can also confirm that your latest installer works great (with my settings).

To be more clear and serious about the subject, I'm also suspecting KB2574819, that you surely integrate... again, please try an image without that four folders I mentioned here in the integration queue (the ones from Not integratable to offline image, of course, added as silent installers). I bet it will solve your issue.