Jump to content

Tuesday77

Members
  • Posts

    475
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Tuesday77

  1. Uff... im not sure if only re-arrangement would be enough...

    Okay, then i think about a new arrangement of existing gui.

    But no more today, i think tomorrow or at weekend.

    Last time iv so much time wasted.. <.<

    Greez

  2. Heyho :-)

    The great thing about the menu stuff is that I can add Gadgets #1, Gadgets #2, etc.. links. So if anyone has any great wallpaper, theme pack links or whatever I can add just let me know.

    Examples: (Please remove if unallowed links)

    - http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/personalization-gallery

    - http://virtualcustoms.net/forumdisplay.php/999-Downloads?s=dc3745d0a382df699e88d6adb09f4415

    - http://www.e-wallpapers.to/

    Greez

  3. So im done with creating, needed more time i was thinking.

    Here, iv recreate the design, its like the original 1.4.29 but a more compresses and reorganized:

     

    Self-explainated i think:

     

    Zer0 GUI Alpha 3:

     

    Main + Start

    m1o6awyi5p1u.jpg

    Advance

    m2yzeogu0ms7.jpg

    Extras

    m39ts6ux8pim.jpg

    Addons

    m4ke1mx4nv3y.jpg

    Downloads

    m5pokrctd609.jpg

    Settings

    m6ok7s6b3f0l.jpg

    Updated main:

    m13vq6oxpsu7z.jpg

    Notes:

    - One Window (no popup, exclude donating atm)

    - Standard loaded is start-tab

    - WHD should include lang packs, custom lists (rica n co), office, and ofcs win iso may

    - May WIM Manager also include splitt n merge smw may

    - U can see, the text of ATM build, can easy kompress, so it can include 6 instead 3 buttons.

    - WTK should check to begin for update, if -> update popup, else nothing

    Sure, its Alpha, just convert idea to bone-frame. :)

    What u think?

    PS: May Downloads before Addons, idk.

    Update:

    Update Main-Window

    Update:

    Update Main-Window again

  4. @RicaNeaga
    Okay u won. :D

    Nice one, thats looks great and so should it to be.
    Strange, i dont understand then the text from Microsoft....
    Really there was written, that sometimes apps need a older version.
    And whats about the 3.5 in Win8 ?!?

    So, 4.0 Installer was for XP only users?
    Okay then its realy time for remove the link.
    What a shame for me, i allways have both installer used.
    Now i can delete the other one. :)

    @Legolash2o
    Okay, i work it now, take a while.. :)
    I try to make a short/boned one.

  5. Okay i try new:

    Exist elemental differences between 4.0 and 4.5 like between 2.0 and 4.0?

    So 4.5.1 is an "hard update" for 4.0 for Win6/7 or a own build?

    Im not sure about this buildnumber-policy from Microsoft. :)

     

    So what 7 or 8 realy need for running ALL .NET writed applications?

     

    Update:

    Example: I have a app written in 4.0 (or what s about 3.5?)

    So, can i delete 4.0 from Image and install ricks 4.5.1, and the application runs without errors?

     

    If its not -> i think its better to keep 4.0 link in WTK, cuz its need (for some).

  6. Hey,

    For first, i have to settle down my hut, for create a new modern gui. :)
    Have you helping hands? Im wondering how quick in creating new gui and new icons so good. Great work, respect!

    But, for sure, i report just my view of it and no facts: Unfortunately I have a bit criticism about it. :(
    I no realy know about this new 2 Way-System, its remember a bit at Windows 8: The try to combine differents parts.
    Tools of same subjects are now split and i have to search for it, links or submenus i cannot see different and it looks unbalanced.
    Now exist also big empty spaces and in submenus are too much to find, its hard to handle..
    Logical wrong orders and the download submenu looks like adwared...

    Please see it not as bad talk, its just how i think about.
    If you really want i can create a preview-picture of my suggestions.

    @RicaNeaga // .NET 4.0
    I remember a article of Windows-Info-Webpage (unfortunately i dont more find), where Microsoft self explain, thats unsure if u really need the 4.5.1 for all. In one view its 4.5.1 an update/upgrade for all other .NETs. So normally apps writed with any runtime need just the latest. Otherway it exist apps they also need a older one. Win8 have still .NET 3.5 for exactly this situation. Win7 have 4.0, and i dont know, whats about the 4.0 Updates? Example me want updates also for 4.0, not just 4.5. Know anybody apps they realy need 4 or earler ones? Or can i do only 4.51 over all in Win7/8 and end? So if need, may better so keep ricks fantastic 4.0 mega pack as linked in WTK.

    Please dont attack me, and greez. :)
     

  7. Yes, much work. :)
    But i think its the work for Pack-Creators to build a compatible, error-free and up2date bundle.
    They call this thing "latest"/"all include"/"for all systems", and release some crap, - no way.

    You integrate an update, you install ISO on ur system, and it results in bsod.
    Im sure u would also going a bit angry. ;)

    Idk, may its just my philosophy: if i make some, i make it full.
    I would it make different, i not say down in ground with WinFuture, but i prefer other ones.

    German answer:
    Linux ist immerhin kostenlos. ;)

  8. Yeah, at first i also dislike the new FF logo, cuz its mozillas modyfing for Win8, - a friend of me still dislike the new icon.

    But more and more now i like this style, its flat and free of noise, hard to explain, it associated "more performance/cleaned/up2date" :)

     

    Independent of taste, i think the best way is to show up2date/true icons/names.

    If i see the old icon, it associating me, i download now an old firefox version, u know.

  9. For first, thank you for much reply. :)
    I will try a fav of methode for answering: parallel lining.
    (And sorry for my bad english i mostly try to write with own words, google translate creates crap)
     

    If I remember right, I think you said some of the updates show up as blue but they still integrate correctly?

     

    No, they were blue and at the end, some updates (probably the blues) were not integrated.
    Idk how WTK handles, for drivers the blue show u just which drivers a duplicates, nothing more i think.
     

    By the way, I can't imagine that the McRip update list you added has any valid, non-superseded updates that none of the other packs have, since it is months old.

     

    These updates from McRip-Repo iv no found in example WHD-Repo (left folder, right whats include all folder).

    uvf1ldqbkt0.jpg

     

    Also, you say that if you found any updates with the same name but were not "twins", that you kept them both.  That makes no sense.

     

    May iv to explain a elemental philosophy:
    Yes, i want all as possible updates, then i have all up-to-date if a need any of them.
    Also i want newest programs which newest features and all, u can compare it with beta users or the complete linux philosophy.
    For this, I take it upon myself to even possibly get error. But this way is better for me, cuz i can enjoy and test new things/methodes.
    Stable/normal is for general mass of peoples, my favorite way is: No risk - No fun. :)

    Another thing is: Its very hard work and take (too) much time to search/compare all updates for supersededs or other. Maybe 1 of 10 updates is realy new, but then i have 1 new updates, the other are overwriten/supersed by WTK or MAY make troubles in future installed. (In Windows altime exist troubles, no matter if i integrate "troubles-updates" or not. :D )
     

    Surely one of them is "right" and the other is "wrong".

     

    But who somebody tell me which is the right one ? (100+ updates to compare)
    Maybe one of them is with LDR-Part, maybe one is localicated, - where from i should know?
    So i integrate just all, spare much time and asking/troubling and all, and MAY i have any wrong in image.. - no matter.
     

    Once you come up with your list, I would suggest sharing it, not only here but with the other list's sites as well for feedback.

     

    Mh, idk, here is for just for fixing errors/support and test WTK.
    May the others dont interest in my list, example the community packs, i really dont understand, why i find Win8 Updates in a pack for Win7. May they have all a reason for their handle. Iv learned in my live, that most peoples no cares anybody opinion, they say "take it or leave it". The reason for i give feedback for WTK for example: I really love this tool, works great and Liam give support/cares everybodys opinion. Other tools/peoples disappoint me. May they can not explain the updates or say promise anything and then nothing. Example u remember RT7Lite? I remember a thread about v3.0, i was waiting so much time - then: A total flop. That all need time and much patience - no my favorite way. ;)

     

    Also:

    I think they all known other updatepacks, so theyve reasons or dont care. Mostly peoples r obstinate, so i see no really a reason to tell her my results...

    Maybe somebody use google and see this thread, so he may exclude Win8/WinXP Update from Win7 UpdatePack.. *laugh*
     

    Wanting them all is one thing, but needlessly taking up space and time for updates that have been superseded or are totally not necessary, is just wasting your time and disk space and asking for future potential problems.

     

    I try to find out with WTK which ones i realy dont need and delete from image, im also a fan of minimal.
    (May hard to understand, otherwise i want all, otherwise i want minimal, after create FULL im going to make my personal lite.)
    After my 2014 ISOs are done, i think i delete next time all other without WHD n KUC, for sure the crappy german packs with Win8 updates and local stuff.
    ATM iv antitwined all, so iv just only which iv integrated, the rest of Mcrip u can see in spoiler up here, iv much (3 TB) disk space, so i can keep some for test.

    Regards! :)

  10. Another suggestion:

    At start the CR mount the Image.. a "cancel"-button is need.

    Wrong choose and then i have to wait for finishing mount or kill the process, not good. :/

     

    Update:

    Another suggestion:

    "Load preset" for Component Remover is missing.

     

    Update:

    1+ remove-option Windows Defender

  11. No, i mean the rebuilding after i unmount a mounted folder in wim-manager: :)

     

    Steps:

    1. Start AIO-Integrator, choose in WIM-Manager integrate some updates, - Kill the task (WTK & wimserv)

    2. Start AIO-Integrator- the WIM-Manager will display and i see the mounted "unknow" - click unmount. (after i want to remove, cuz crashed progess)

    3. WIM-Manager do rebuild the image after unmounting - thats no realy need.

  12. Hard to reproduce the errors, the specific files were:

     

    windows6.1-kb2603229-x64-express.cab
    windows6.1-kb2786081-x64-express.cab
    windows6.1-kb2882822-x64-express.cab
    windows6.1-kb2882822-x86-express.cab

     

    Some of them found by KUC by testing installed in VM, some of these was retrieved by Update Retriever (1.4.30.5 & 1.4.30.8)

    Iv tested now with 1.4.30.11 and follow express cabs, retrieved by Update Retriever of same version, these:

     

    Windows6.1-KB2446710-x64-EXPRESS.cab
    windows6.1-kb2862330-v2-x64-express.cab
    windows6.1-kb2913431-x64-express.cab
    windows6.1-kb2913602-x64-express.cab

     

    Update2:

    So, integrating finished: no error window came more. :)

    But, the updates marked as "unknow error detect" (red icon) while integrating progress.

    The "integrated"-tab list these updates then as "not present".

     

    BTW: The express are ~50KB sized, thats normal?

  13. @sasnet
    May post as bug in bug section. :)

     

    ---

     

    May important for guide:

    What means the follow states?

     

    - Installed

    - Install Pending

    - Stages

    - Supdersed (Okay thats means is "replaced", so its no more necessary and can deleted"

    - Not Present

     

    Whats different, how handle?

     

     

  14. Update:

    Fixed in 1.4.30.11 :)

    Oh great, thank u much, ie11(win7) looks much better for me. :)

     

    ---

     

    Iv splittet my old report thread for create in right area.

    The Browser icons are outdated, here is looks ATM (1.4.30.10):

     

    so4p8n93s0d.jpg

     

    Okay, the IE-Icon is replaced with the Win8 (modern ui-crap), may a thing of taste, i prefer the win7 ie11 Logo:

     

    ie116k4izcorj0.jpg

     

    Firefox logos, may u can see the different:

    (ATM WTK use the 2009 Logo, up-to-date is the 4th - 2013 logo)

     

    firefoxlogos4tsyegmdqi.png

     

     

    Greez

     

    PS: Chrome n Opera looks its up-to-date.

  15. Source: http://www.wincert.net/forum/topic/11785-solved-brokenzer0s-great-bugsuggestion-report/
    Okay, sorry again, Iv saw just it later, that every bug need a own post.
    But thanks a lot for explainations and ofcs - solving all that things.
    Here i try to move the requests in requests subforum.

    For the exceptions:
    Okay seems that all updates not for Win7Sp1, but why do WinKit not skip these instead of create exception ? :)
    (Yap may some of them was "express" cabs, example this one who "cast as folder" after install was done.)

    (Im still just wondering why win8 updates and other not compatible still in some Win7 UpdatePacks.. what a crap. <.<
    For future i think i never use more this german-community ****, just only good ones like WHD, RiceNeaga and other.)

     

    Greez

  16. Nah thats just the german language pack. :)

    "SP1" means, thats the LP for ISOs which have already SP1 integrated, thats its.

    It exist LPs for RTM and for SP1 ISOs, and im not sure, but remember it exist may another for "SP1-Refresh".

     

    Yap, im ever use original enu language, but need german-lp for familiy and friends' computers.

     

    Okay thank you, for next ones i use "DOS-Paths" (withouth empty space in names and all.)

×
×
  • Create New...