mooms Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 What are you talking about ? This thread is only for 4.5.1 and there is no mention to XP. To be clear: 4.5.1 is only for Win7.4.0 can be installed on XP and 7.4.5.1 replace 4.0, no need for both in Win7. You can pack the 4.0 into and addon for XP. For win7, no need for an addon, can be added 'as is' in Win Toolkit. And yes, you can use the tools provided to remake your own installer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
55ttt Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 (edited) Sorry,Got the "to be used for” part switched around.Why is4.5.1 (for win 7) dated 10-17-2013 ?and4 (for XP SP3) dated 1-05-2014 ?The dates and versions seem to be switched around....or is the 4.5.1 just not updated yet? >>4.5.1 replace 4.0, no need for both in Win7.Yes I read that. >>For win7, no need for an addon, can be added 'as is' in Win Toolkit.Where in Win Toolkit? As an add-on?Thanks Edited January 12, 2014 by 55ttt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooms Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Where in Win Toolkit? As an add-on?As a silent installer, in the silent instal+SFX tab of Win Toolkit. The dates and versions seem to be switched around.4.0 was updated recently, that's all, there is no mixup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
55ttt Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Where in Win Toolkit? As an add-on?As a silent installer, in the silent instal+SFX tab of Win Toolkit.The dates and versions seem to be switched around.4.0 was updated recently, that's all, there is no mixup.Thought I had read you have to first unpack, add switches, edit config, and then repack before it could be placed there.Thanks for clarifying.Ok, so 4.5.1 is up to date (the updates done with 4.0 did not need to be done with 4.5.1)?Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooms Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 No actual need to repack, installer can be used as-is with the switch /y to make it passive or /ai to make it completely silent (not recommended as the install is relatively long). You have to repack only if you want to change something in the default installer.Personally, instead of using Intl installer, I repack the US one to add French langpack , this save space & time on unpacking (just before installing), but that's completely optional and don't change anything the the actual install. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo Posted January 19, 2014 Author Share Posted January 19, 2014 Updated, added Hotfix Rollup KB2908383 installer to replace rtm HJSC and VandIT 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bphlpt Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Thanks Rick! Cheers and Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiersee Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Hi Rick, it's already 2014 ! Thanks, Thiersee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bphlpt Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 LOL I fixed it for him. (Edited title from 2013 -> 2014) Cheers and Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wela Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 @ ricktendo There is something wrong with this file http://adf.ly/1713566/dotnet451slim. My antivirus blocked the file as dangerous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo Posted January 20, 2014 Author Share Posted January 20, 2014 Probably due to the fact that it is a sfx I invite anybody who wants to verify the files contained, they can do an admin install of the original KB2908383 and compare both sets of files with a file compare utility (like beyond compare,) they can also use InstEd to compare the original MSI and slim MSI to see what is changed/different (to see nothing fishy is added only removed stuff) I uploaded to virus total https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/721cd02ab4bfbbbc1f7758c6ee8ea3d9f73d8ac6f5671edc0286b66e617a1a35/analysis/1390242982/ It all comes down to do you trust me or not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bphlpt Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 Probably due to the fact that it is a sfxOr he's using a inferior antivirus. Mine (COMODO Internet Security) doesn't think this file is bad. He should report the file to the antivirus company as a false positive. Cheers and Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
55ttt Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 (edited) There is something wrong with this file http://adf.ly/1713566/dotnet451slim. My antivirus blocked the file as dangerous. @wela What virus did the report indicate? Just curious.Thanks for the update! Edited January 22, 2014 by 55ttt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wela Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 (edited) @ ricktendo I respect your work. In the past i havn´t had any problems. I´ve downloaded now the file via Virtual PC without antivirus. IE11 gave me the warning that the file is suspicous, cause the publisher could not verified. This message i have never seen before.I send the file to antivirus company for registering as false positiv. Thanks for your work Regards Edit:No Virus, its the URL-path. Don´t know why, but my Eset didn´t like the Path for download. Sorry. Edited January 21, 2014 by wela Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCM Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 MD5 for me: B7DFF388019736B6288327AD466DB4AB is correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo Posted January 21, 2014 Author Share Posted January 21, 2014 Forgot to update the hashes, done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo_G Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 The links to the SFX Makers are not valid. Besides of that: Thanks for your work, Ricktendo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dareckibmw Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 I hope Ricktendo won't mind if I share those tools with you, until he fix links. .NET4.5.1 SFX Maker (installer repacker): http://www21.zippyshare.com/v/65670322/file.html Silent "No GUI" SFX alternative: http://www21.zippyshare.com/v/91833862/file.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo_G Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Thx, dareckibmw! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo Posted January 29, 2014 Author Share Posted January 29, 2014 Sorry, updated links ZEUS__ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicaNeaga Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Probably you already know about them... 2898869 & 2901126 ZEUS__ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo Posted February 12, 2014 Author Share Posted February 12, 2014 Probably you already know about them... 2898869 & 2901126 Updates (oct 31+nov 9) files are older than the rollup (nov 19) files Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicaNeaga Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Then maybe it's best you make an updated installer and supress them, because they're showing in WU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiersee Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Hi, I've just installed (VM) with the actual FW 4.5.1 (with RollUp) and the two updates kb2898869 & kb2901126 have NOT been requested by WU! On my working system (older FW-pack with updates almost every month) they have been requested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
55ttt Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 (edited) If using this ([slim] .NET Framework 4.5.1 Full x86/x64 (1-19-2014))in a Win7 VM and going online with WU, then the updates included inthis should NOT show in WU as needing to be installed?Right? Edited February 12, 2014 by 55ttt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.