NIM Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 Hi guys,I need a favor from you all who'll read this topic. We have to test ping response times on two servers and I need your help on this.So here's what you should do..Open a command prompt (Start-->Run-->CMD+Enter)Type ping 208.73.33.194, write down this info: Minimum = xx ms, Maximum = xx ms, Average = xx msRepeat the action for the second addressType ping 74.52.38.226, write down this info: Minimum = xx ms, Maximum = xx ms, Average = xx msCheck and paste your results here.If anyone wants to know, we're testing the new server. This is the first step and better ping will not guarantee us faster access, it depends on the server hardware too. That's something will test out later on..Thank you all.Server 208.73.33.194Ping statistics for 208.73.33.194:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 162ms, Maximum = 168ms, Average = 165msServer 74.52.38.226Ping statistics for 208.73.33.194:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 173ms, Average = 171ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 208.73.33.194Ping statistics for 208.73.33.194: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 62ms, Maximum = 75ms, Average = 67ms74.52.38.226Ping statistics for 74.52.38.226: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 75ms, Maximum = 81ms, Average = 78ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUZR4LIFE Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 (edited) TEST 1on 208.73.33.194Ping statistics for 208.73.33.194:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 26msTEST 2 on 208.73.33.194Ping statistics for 208.73.33.194:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 28ms, Average = 26msTEST 1 on 74.52.38.226Ping statistics for 74.52.38.226:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 60msTEST 2 on 74.52.38.226Ping statistics for 74.52.38.226:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 60ms Edited December 31, 2007 by LUZR4LIFE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 (edited) From the OS:208.73.33.194:Pinging 208.73.33.194 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=52Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=52Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=52Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=52Ping statistics for 208.73.33.194: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 18ms74.52.38.226:Pinging 74.52.38.226 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=45Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=45Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=45Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=45Ping statistics for 74.52.38.226: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 52ms-----With Tomato firmware (from my WRT54GL router):208.73.33.194:Seq Address RX Bytes TTL RTT (ms) +/- (ms)0 208.73.33.194 (208.73.33.194) 64 53 24.60 1 208.73.33.194 (208.73.33.194) 64 53 20.80 -3.802 208.73.33.194 (208.73.33.194) 64 53 18.90 -1.903 208.73.33.194 (208.73.33.194) 64 53 19.00 0.104 208.73.33.194 (208.73.33.194) 64 53 17.20 -1.80Round-Trip: 17.2 min, 20.1 avg, 24.6 max (ms) Packets: 5 transmitted, 5 received, 0% lost74.52.38.226:Seq Address RX Bytes TTL RTT (ms) +/- (ms)0 74.52.38.226 (74.52.38.226) 64 46 51.30 1 74.52.38.226 (74.52.38.226) 64 46 52.20 0.902 74.52.38.226 (74.52.38.226) 64 46 52.10 -0.103 74.52.38.226 (74.52.38.226) 64 46 51.50 -0.604 74.52.38.226 (74.52.38.226) 64 46 51.20 -0.30Round-Trip: 51.2 min, 51.6 avg, 52.2 max (ms) Packets: 5 transmitted, 5 received, 0% lost Edited December 31, 2007 by Tarun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cro-man Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 Test 1Test 2Test 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrat Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 With Ping-Test-EasyHost:IP: 208.73.33.194 Sent: 10Received: 10Lost: 0Loss Rate: 0,00 %Min Time: 20 msMax Time: 23 msAvg Time: 20 msAvg TTL: 55--------------------------Host:IP: 74.52.38.226 Sent: 10Received: 10Lost: 0Loss Rate: 0,00 %Min Time: 58 msMax Time: 59 msAvg Time: 58 msAvg TTL: 49 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sm0k3r Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 From PC208.73.33.194Ping statistics for 208.73.33.194:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 103ms, Maximum = 105ms, Average = 104ms74.52.38.226Ping statistics for 74.52.38.226:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 137ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 138msFrom Netgear DG834PN Wireless Router208.73.33.194PING 208.73.33.194 (208.73.33.194): 56 data bytes64 bytes from 208.73.33.194: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=100.0 ms64 bytes from 208.73.33.194: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=100.0 ms64 bytes from 208.73.33.194: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=105.0 ms64 bytes from 208.73.33.194: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=105.0 ms--- 208.73.33.194 ping statistics ---4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet lossround-trip min/avg/max = 100.0/102.5/105.0 ms74.52.38.226PING 74.52.38.226 (74.52.38.226): 56 data bytes64 bytes from 74.52.38.226: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=140.0 ms64 bytes from 74.52.38.226: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=135.0 ms64 bytes from 74.52.38.226: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=135.0 ms64 bytes from 74.52.38.226: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=135.0 ms--- 74.52.38.226 ping statistics ---4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet lossround-trip min/avg/max = 135.0/136.2/140.0 ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIM Posted January 1, 2008 Author Share Posted January 1, 2008 Seems that the possible new server has better ping for all of us. Now, I should find out what hardware is on that machine.. :sweatingbullets: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeaNut Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 (edited) Well, i hope i'm not too late with this, my measurements from Chello (UPC Broadband Cable Internet provider in Hungary):Tested from Windows XP x64 SP2 ENU, with only MSN running in background, and cFosSpeed:Pinging 208.73.33.194 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=46Reply from 208.73.33.194: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=46Ping statistics for 208.73.33.194: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 115ms, Maximum = 135ms, Average = 124ms----Pinging 74.52.38.226 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=47Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=157ms TTL=47Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=47Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=46Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=46Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=46Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=46Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=47Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=47Reply from 74.52.38.226: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=47Ping statistics for 74.52.38.226: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 141ms, Maximum = 172ms, Average = 148ms Edited January 6, 2008 by PeaNut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIM Posted January 19, 2008 Author Share Posted January 19, 2008 Well, it seems that the new server we're planning to move on has better ping. The question is now does it have good hardware as the one we're currently using has..We're getting more and more visits daily and silver hosting package isn't sufficient for us now. We'll have to move for the gold package before we move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.