ar_seven_am
-
Posts
47 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by ar_seven_am
-
-
Thanks Rick. I'll go ahead and ask since I know there are others that would like it, but is there a chance you could make a similar pack for XP x64 and 2003? ( I assume the same pack could be installed on both? ) I think that type of pack has always been missing from the various .NET offerings. Just a thought.
Cheers and Regards
+1 for that as for xp x64, net framework 1.1 not available, I'm trying to make that but stuck in what thing that doesn't needed by windows (just like ricktendo did, he's very good in slimming the pack so only needed component will be installed).
-
These installers are intended for XP x86.
If you're on Win 7 x64, you only need 4.5.1 installer by ricktendo.
.NET 2.0 through 3.5 are already included as part of the Win7 OS, both x86 and x64, and the installers of the type used for XP are no longer appropriate. They are updated as necessary through WU / MU. There is at least one report that .NET 1.1 can be installed on Win7, but I have not tried it.
EDIT: If you were asking about something to use for XP x64, I don't know the answer to that question.
Cheers and Regards
actually I need for making true addon for xp x64 just like onepiece/nonno fabio do in xp x86, not for windows 7 by the way...
if u do look in windows xp 64 bit section in ryanvm forum (or maybe here), mostly addons (especially true addons) only for x86...
sorry for requesting that, I'm just trying to help others who need that (I use for testing only in vmware, dont have the license for xp 64 bit either)
-
You can find .Net 1.1 to 3.5 installers by user hidden and jaynbe here: http://www.wincert.net/forum/forum/105-svcpack-addons/ (simply extract the installer from the addon)
mooms, sorry for asking this, jaynbe and user hidden made only for 32 bit system? no 64 bit support or maybe support dual system (x86-x64) just like ricktendo did for his net framework repack?
-
-
hi i'm sorry rick, is the file still exist? I currently need the x64 for slipstream into my xp x64 source, when I download the enu x64 version from this link :
http://adf.ly/1713566/wmp11x64enu
i've got this :
Not FoundThe requested URL /ricktendo/Repack/wmp11-windowsxp-x64-enu-repack.exe was not found on this server.Additionally, a 500 Internal Server Error error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
-
Merry christmast n happy holliday to all of u who celebrate that...
-
again WRONG. I can integrate anytime into 7 via DISM those kind of mixed chipset Intel chipset drivers (ONE example), that were meant only for previous OSes than windows 7,
the package driver integrated but will not be USED, yes u can integrated that but WINDOWS INSTALLATION will ignore that if it's not compatible with the hardware (check the panther directory n the log inside ur windows directory if u dont believe me).
unlike windows vista, windows 7 more smarter, it will prevent crash driver installation n also more flexible when searching the available driver version.
peace...
-
Hey guys, do you think it would be safe to add new drivers to a customized image, if it's the ONLY thing I do (no addons etc)?
I think yes as long the driver compatible with ur windows image.
-
STOP using Driverpacks!!! They are VERY good for XP, but for windows 7 - and for use with W7T - are DISASTROUS!!! The reason is simple: they include also Vista versions of those drivers besides 7 ones, in some cases even XP drivers (Intel LAN foe example - maybe they deleted them lately, I dunno), sometimes x86 drivers in the x64 pack and viceversa.
I need to disagree, I'm using driverpacks for backup for installing my friends pc/notebook since it's really tired to check every driver ID or signature, also sometime the website for the drivers source doesn't exist so for me driverpack save my time. Some notebook with AMD processor get problem, but it's becuz the driver itself, I see mostly driverpack team need to tweak the setting so it can be compatible n match with the driver setting.
most of driver failed to integrated becuz the driverpack itself have been outdated n we need to update that (new hardware, new driver), also I do agree with mr. smartepant, if u do have problem, u can post to driverpack forum for a bug or suggestion so the driverpack team can improve that.
-
Select the tweaks you want, go to options tab, click 'Current OS' and click yes.
That will apply all tweaks to the current OS, you may need to restart
but lego, with exporting .reg file user may know what change so incase the tweak doesn't fit in his computer, he can revert back. (more like educational). Offcourse for some advanced user, he can also change back that (use regshot, system monitor etc), but how bout ppl who know minor things about computer?
-
yupz, I think it's good idea too since we need to use regshot to know what registry changed/deleted after we apply that with W7Toolkit.
+1 for this!
-
In AIO Tool > themes pack I add 4 themes but they does not integrated :sad02:
Experienced very same behaviour...
to both of u, do u use the same image name, an example "Windows 7 Ultimate" even the image had different arch (x86 or x64)?
added: @lego: I found out, "HKCU" in registry tweak doesn't exported properly into build admin account, if u didn't use that, it will ok (all registry setting exported into ur local account), but if u use autologon with admin (usually if we want to grant permission) in installing aplication in audit, I can see it doesn't work well.
-
Sorry you're so upset that a memory optimizer does not in fact optimize memory or performance. In fact those programs do the exact opposite, they hurt performance. I have provided the links that have more than enough proof that these things only hurt your computers performance.
Mark Russinovich is the maker of the Systernals Suite. This man knows so much about Windows and it's internals that Microsoft hired him to work for them because of the excellent work he has done.
Memory optimization has been a long discussed topic, which has also had comprehensive research going into it. Mark is not the first to write an article about why these programs are garbage.
But hey, it's your system and if you want to hurt the performance of your computer; by all means. Just don't say you weren't warned.
Tarun, to be honest, if u work as graphicist or architect, an example if u use autocad, sketchup or adobe which limit how many memory needed, u'll get fatal error when the memory run out, u NEED additional free memory for the software to be used. (usually u'll get BSOD or ur system restart).
Let's say I only have 2 GB memory, 1 graphic application need 1 GB RAM free (not used by system), another application need 1 GB RAM free too. If I do multitasking n use both, u can guess ur computer will be sloooooooooooooooooooooooow as hell when u do another aplication becuz u've run out of resources, now the free ram tool (actually "free ram" might cause misperseption, should be free ram switcher or something) help u to freeing the ram when u switch to another aplication (at least what task manager show, I see additional DELAY time (about 1 second) processing when switching but it goes normally without having error).
I'm not saying u or mark russinovich wrong , but ur assumption about RAM OPTIMIZER for this I can say wrong, yes it doesn't give a lot different performance to me, but DO HELP to other people who work with heavy task in graphic rendering which always request FREE memory when they work.
for test, add hotfix package into ur windows image with dism or pkgmgr, open another aplication (multitasking), do look task manager, now use the tools n do the same things, check the task manager too (from this simple test, u'll find that).
note : Tarun, I do respect u since I also like to read ur post or topic in MSFN n I'm not upset, I'm just tired since I also do agree with Mark Russinovich said about RAM OPTIMIZER are garbage (yes, I think it's true, in the past time I use crapware which actually make me change my RAM twice, oh my) but this tool is different (that's why I ask lego for the source code, if I know he will make this separated, I wont make that by myself, oh well) usually RAM OPTIMIZER software are enemy for WINDOWS system, but this, I could say FRIEND?
added note for lego: I think the name should be free ram switcher, not becuz I dont like the name but with change the name people might understood how it work.
-
Add 'God Mode' to Computer context-menu
Please
it's the same as "all task" in Desktop Context menu, have u check that?
-
@ Legolash2o. Thank You
Hope ricktendo can make KB2607070 a silent installer...
why do u need that for when u can extracted the three cab from there n use W7T (or other tools or just use DISM) n apply the update into ur windows 7 image?
-
v77 released.
*1.3.0.77B^FIX: File in use error when integrating unattended via AIO
*1.3.0.77B^FIX: WIM Manager will now mark image as 'corrupt' if imagex is closed during mount
*1.3.0.77B^FIX: Force Windows Media Player x64 tweak
1. The first error is where a user selects the save unattended path to be the same as the file they selected, the file can't replace itself
2. If a user was mounting an image and they closed imagex using task manager, W7T said it was mounted fine, now W7T will report it as corrupt.
3. Some users reported that this tweak did not work, so i fixed it.
for registry tweak, I think the answer is only change the setting from "Specialize" setting into "OOBE" (use RunOnce just like nlite do in XP) so it will apply to the "current user" too since if we include AUTOUNATTEND setting, only "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE" and "HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT" apply correctly, but not "HKEY_CURRENT_USER". (u can make an *.inf so u can load that at OOBE stage).
registry tweak perform correctly if we didn't use "Autounattend.xml".
as for file replacement etc, theme tweak, update, u've done correctly.
note: IT'S NOT REQUEST, I just suggest something since most of member here complain "autounattend setting didn't work" which is actually work but have conflict with the tweak itself. (I use regshot to record what W7T do with registry tweak n saved that as *.reg, applied that manually in firstlogon, it work).
-
addition to Kels statement, @mooms: that's was "IMAGE NAME", it doesn't depend on what language we used, u can edit them manually, no need to add or fix new function inside W7Toolkit.
-
Thanks!
Already tested...but unfortunatly doesn't work, because all passes are proceded and the batch files will be launched two times: for x86 and amd64 passes.
Even if the batch is correct with this particular Autounattend.xml file, the best method is to create different batch files for each architecture, like shown with my example above.
However may works for 32-bit selected Editions, but not for 64-bit selected Editions and the installation fails!
u set that in WPI, but what crashfly mention is in "specialize" or "OOBE" which doesn't need additional "Post Installation" there.
also I still dont get why do u mention the command where my question is here :
myselfidem, you dont need to set 2 setting in "<settings pass="windowsPE">" becuz that only for boot.wim which we used only one (x86 boot.wim), if we do add x64 setting too, some automated task like "Accept EULA" will be asked again if we choose x64 image.
also I'm still tryin' to find out how to make custom menu so incase we need to repair our windows installation, we can still use our customized dvd (if we add autounattended setting there, it will skipped n directly to windows installation).
we used only one boot.wim (for x86, which the image contain 2 image name, it's "Microsoft Windows PE (x86)" in index 1, and "Microsoft Windows Setup (x86)" in index 2), now this setting :
<settings pass="windowsPE">
<component name="Microsoft-Windows-International-Core-WinPE" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" language="neutral" versionScope="nonSxS" xmlns:wcm="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<SetupUILanguage>
<UILanguage>en-US</UILanguage>
</SetupUILanguage>
<InputLocale>0421:00000421</InputLocale>
<SystemLocale>id-ID</SystemLocale>
<UILanguage>en-US</UILanguage>
<UserLocale>id-ID</UserLocale>
</component>
<component name="Microsoft-Windows-Setup" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" language="neutral" versionScope="nonSxS" xmlns:wcm="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<ComplianceCheck>
<DisplayReport>Never</DisplayReport>
</ComplianceCheck>
<Diagnostics>
<OptIn>false</OptIn>
</Diagnostics>
<DiskConfiguration>
<WillShowUI>Always</WillShowUI>
</DiskConfiguration>
<DynamicUpdate>
<Enable>true</Enable>
<WillShowUI>OnError</WillShowUI>
</DynamicUpdate>
<UserData>
<ProductKey>
<Key>xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx</Key>
<WillShowUI>OnError</WillShowUI>
</ProductKey>
<AcceptEula>true</AcceptEula>
<FullName>User</FullName>
<Organization>MS USER</Organization>
</UserData>
</component>
</settings>it doesn't needed since we only used x86 boot.wim (in clean installation windows 7).
-
hi legolash! windows defender please!! and when i remove de windoes speech, the iso have the same weight than the original whit windows speech, is a bug? and also i remove a lot of packages but dont affect so much the weight too
weight or size???
-
I coudn't understand the solution. I have lost myself between posts while looking for the solution :sad02:
Could you please explain it clearly? Unfortunately I am not one of the smart members of wincert
since we use clean install n boot directly from our windows media installation (dvd or usb), we used setup source from boot.wim image index 2 (Windows Setup PE), n seem if we used autounattend.xml only in the root of our media installation(USB), windows setup cant find it (look in the panther directory, u'll find the log of ur installation process.)
ricktendo methode is correct, manipulate n inject the autounattend.xml directly to the boot.wim image index 2 will make windows setup PE recognized our unattend value. (make any sense to u, we used the setup process from there, offcourse autounattend.xml should be placed there too
). -
Yes, I understand. Many thanks.
I haven't this problem.
Missing inside your Autounattend.xml file AIO the first lines:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<unattend xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:unattend">I will make an test with your values BUT adding subfolders (x86 and x64) for RunSynchronousCommands and FirstLogonCommands.
Examples:
<FirstLogonCommands>
<SynchronousCommand wcm:action="add">
<CommandLine>hidcon %SystemDrive%\Install\x64\FirstLog_x64.cmd</CommandLine>
<Description>Post Setup Installation</Description>
<Order>1</Order>
<RequiresUserInput>false</RequiresUserInput>
</SynchronousCommand>
</FirstLogonCommands>
<component name="Microsoft-Windows-Deployment" processorArchitecture="x86" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" language="neutral" versionScope="nonSxS" xmlns:wcm="[url="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State"]http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State[/url]" xmlns:xsi="[url="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"]http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance[/url]">
<RunSynchronous>
<RunSynchronousCommand wcm:action="add">
<Order>1</Order>
<Path>%SystemDrive%\Install\Apps\Daemon\x86\SPTDinst-x86.exe add /q</Path>
</RunSynchronousCommand>
</RunSynchronous>
</component>edit: I've mistakenly upload file, that's only some copy paste I made before so I can check in panther folder. yes it doesn't have what u specified above, havent notice that until I download the attachment (the current firstlogon.cmd doesn't add hidcon.exe binary file).
here's the correct autounattend.xml (sorry) :
-
I think u need to change ur title, I dont have problem with unattend windows vista/7 with usb (both storage or stick), all u need is tweak the boot.wim image index 2(just like ricktendo do) to include ur autounattend.xml
. -
i want my own drivers to be integrated. W7T reports that drivers are being integrated but when i install OS to the physical machine - drivers not found for the devices for which i tried to integrate my drivers.
Does W7T save all drivers after OS install somewhere?
@adminxp: do u check ur driver package have an executable file too? usually in the executable file, u need to extract that too incase the executable file is packed self executable archive that contain driver file that needed to be installed in ur computer.
-
Weird! Tested whithout error my Autounattend.xml file AIO (x86/amd64) and no double messages (like "Accept EULA")!
Could you share your Autounattend.xml file ?
this is what I used now, I do clean install yesterday so I've deleted temporary files in my pc (I'm sorry, I dont know u need that) :
the only different with the non working one is there's no ""<settings pass="windowsPE">" for x64. (I hope u understand with that, I havent install the english translator, sorry).
[Repak] Universal Extractor 1.9.16.202
in Installer Repacks
Posted · Edited by ar_seven_am
the installation file is corrupt, care to reupload? thx...