RicaNeaga Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I've asked you here to sort the updates in Microsoft's way, with KB9xxxxxxx first, and only then KB2xxxxxxx. I've repeated this obsessively in various threads because I didn't wanted you to implement the alphabetical sorting, that wrongfully puts KB2xxxxxxx before KB9xxxxxxxx. And just what I feared has happened. If you cannot make the sorting by name to put KB9xxxxx first, then please remove the sorting by name ''feature''. It was better before without this sorting, when I could integrate the KBs directly from explorer in the right order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 It only sorts when you click the columnheader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Ah I see what the issue is... The only way I would get it to work is if i turned KB9XXXXX into KB09XXXXX and have a leading 0. UPDATE: Seems to work nicely when I add a leading 0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicaNeaga Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 Don't believe it 'till I see it in a test build. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Test build up, with red update fix too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicaNeaga Posted February 4, 2013 Author Share Posted February 4, 2013 Can confirm that now everything is ok in test 4. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 No problem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.