shon3i

I am pretty sure that i am checked installed updates, and none showed _BF, while i am use KUC and after integrating i see some updates had _BF. I use almost all updates from VHDownloader so i suppose that some will be installed in LDR, but none of them show BF. So is there specific update who have LDR just for testing purposes ? because i am sure will not integrate as LDR

I noticed that if i checked LDR-QFE mode in options of AIO integrator, updates will be integrated only in GDR mode. Did i missed something? or there is special reason for that ? I use last updates from WHDownloader and many updates can be installed in LDR mode... On windows 7 everything works just fine. Also can i suggest some option, if we look readme of updates from WHDownloader, we see that some updates need to be install in only GDR, so would be nice if we can select something for example force GDR install, to can choose what update(s) will install in what mode(s). Thanks...

Thanks

I did, but i just want to see is something on my side..

Hello, I never have this problem before, but now somehow auto-update of WinToolkit not working, when i manuali click on update i get this message Mine internet connection works normally and wincert is obviously avaible

@Rick, the link on first page dosen't seem correct, it not follow correctly to download, adf.ly will not start to count EDIT: it work if i remove http://

Thanks rick you saved me time to update mine package , you always do it in right way.

KUC+McRip+SoLoR = WIN

+1 for supporting KUC updater, since solor not active in past. Also will be good integrate McRip server.

One more req if possible for solor downloader, when i select some group ie additions, and select all updates to download, can W7T automaticly make subfolders like are on server to make not conflict files with duplicate names, that will overwritte in download. Thanks

Thanks I am very appreciative

Ofcourse

Done testing on mine laptop and successfuly produce same error, but with different setup, on laptop i have Home Premium x64 with only C: and D: partition, i use all default settings, except i ticked on LDR/QFE in option before integrating process start. I also tryed to extract all MSU to CAB and integrate CABS instead MSU, but produce same error in integtation. Also i notice in integration process that when apear some hotfix name in W7T statusbar some of them are showing twice like for example Integrating update 23/313 (KB2541014) then show same Integrating update 23/313 (KB2541014 QFE) but this time when i look in cInst folder i found one and only update-bf.mum. Btw did anybody else can also test and confirm? For now i will stick with normal integration+LDR placeholders. Lego if you need something, I will gladly help.

Yes i am on v96 since you second post in this thread. One thing i can notice is that not always on same hotfix, but is definitely related to QFE branch. I am prety sure that something wrong with LDR/QFE mode. I am doing another test without LDR/QFE option and again integration process passes fine. Btw i am always disable Eset Smart Security first to eliminate possible problem which AV can made. I am thinking now to record video of integration as proof, but i would like to somebody also test and confirm this. I can also test on mine laptop, but i need day or two.

Currently ~30GB before mount. Is that low? I had same space last month i didn't have issues with ~82a revision. It's interesting that without LDR/QFE mode everything work great. I can do same again to recheck.

1. Currently test on Windows 7 Ultimate x86, but after i plan to integrate same to Home Basic x86 and Starter x86 2. Windows 7 Ultimate x64 (GDR updated) 3. shon3i-pc 4. D:\WIN7\2011\Jan\x86\*.msu 5. E:\W7T

There is only Driver_Errors.txt but that is not from this year, is old when i experimenting with some driverpacks last month. I mean is there some DISM log or somewere where show this error more precisely. Btw when this error popup i navigate to W7T temp folder and i navigate to cInst, in this folder i only found update-bf.mum and no other files. Is that ok? Can somebody also confirm this ? Btw Lego can you give me if you have some early revision to test for example 93-94.

Ok, what log you need ? where to find integration log ?

Nope Lego, still same issue. I don't know what is but without LDR/QFE option everything is great. Btw i add everything from SoLoR pack except LDR placeholders. Can i send you some log? I look in process explorer and here is last cmd "C:\Windows\System32\PkgMgr.exe" /norestart /ip /o:"E:\W7T\Mount;E:\W7T\Mount\Windows" /m:"E:\W7T\cInst\update-bf.mum" Here is contents of update-bf.mum <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v3" manifestVersion="1.0" description="Fix for KB2541014" displayName="default" company="Microsoft Corporation" copyright="Microsoft Corporation" supportInformation="http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=2541014" creationTimeStamp="2011-04-22T18:16:19Z" lastUpdateTimeStamp="2011-04-22T18:16:19Z"> <assemblyIdentity name="Package_for_KB2541014_BF" version="6.1.1.0" language="neutral" processorArchitecture="x86" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35"/> <package identifier="KB2541014_BF" applicabilityEvaluation="deep" releaseType="Update" restart="possible"> <parent buildCompare="EQ" serviceCompare="EQ" integrate="separate" disposition="detect"> <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package" version="6.1.7600.16385" processorArchitecture="x86" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" versionScope="nonSxS"/> <assemblyIdentity name="WinEmb-FS-Core" language="neutral" version="6.1.7600.16385" processorArchitecture="x86" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" buildType="release"/> <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package" language="neutral" version="6.1.7601.17514" processorArchitecture="x86" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" buildType="release"/> <assemblyIdentity name="WinEmb-FS-Core" language="neutral" version="6.1.7601.17514" processorArchitecture="x86" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" buildType="release"/> </parent> <installerAssembly name="Microsoft-Windows-ServicingStack" version="6.0.0.0" language="neutral" processorArchitecture="x86" versionScope="nonSxS" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35"/> <update name="2541014-9_neutral_PACKAGE"> <package integrate="hidden"> <assemblyIdentity name="Package_for_KB2541014_RTM_BF" version="6.1.1.0" language="neutral" processorArchitecture="x86" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35"/> </package> </update> <update name="2541014-10_neutral_PACKAGE"> <package integrate="hidden"> <assemblyIdentity name="Package_for_KB2541014_SP1_BF" version="6.1.1.0" language="neutral" processorArchitecture="x86" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35"/> </package> </update> </package> </assembly> On W7T statusbar stay KB2541014 QFE

Yep i know, but still cilent only is less file size (about 5-6mb) and that is huge for someone who want to put a lot of stuff and keep DVD5 size of installation

I don't see how that help here? When this error popup, integration stops in W7T, and if i click ok integration process continute till some update not show this error message again. This ruin integration process and i am must sit and wait to error popup, please imagine if i use to integrate to all windows images.... not go. Btw i do same thing earlyer with W7T Alpha 82 IIRC and integration process with same hotfix passes fine. Why? But i update W7T because i see is RC and it's recommended to have lastest version right ?

@Rick i know, i am not mean in that way, i found this W7T downloader very usefull when downloading all stuff need for my needs, otherwise i must copy every link from solor repository to jdownloader and then check what i downloaded, very borring stuff. Reason i not use your installer is because i use Net4 Client Prfofile only and use your core (slim instaler on solor repository) and integrate downloaded hotfixes manually, i have some reason for it. I just want to have downloader which can download everything from solor repository as is, and it have option to sort by date, folder.... colums that have, nothing else. Legolash2o is that possible ? Thanks.

I now use to integrate last SoLoR pack, and i face with new problem, this error popup for almost every hotfix. i checked LDR/QFE mode in options.

I am very pleased with lasted changes in SoLoR updates downloader, but i notice bug, if i select Additions on list i don't see Hotfix Client/Extended for x86 only x64. Also very usefull option will be to sort by colum i click, like date, folder, file, size etc... Thanks.

Generaly it's my fault i will know for future that for sure, just also other members know same . I here just wanted to point bug.