pennsylvaniaron

Members
  • Content count

    265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

pennsylvaniaron last won the day on July 14 2016

pennsylvaniaron had the most liked content!

About pennsylvaniaron

  • Rank
    Squire

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    PA, USA
  • OS
    Windows 7 x64
  • Country
    United States

Recent Profile Visitors

1003 profile views
  1. Does kb4032782 pertain to CONVENIENCE UL64 updates? I do not see it. Was also wondering why KB2533552 is still included in ul64 convenience updates? I don't integrate it anymore and iso works perfectly! Thanks for taking the time to DL these updates every month. Much appreciated.
  2. rhahgleuhargh question. On my main win 7 home system yesterday when the updates came from M$ in addition to kb4025341 I received kb2952664. they both got successfully installed. I then did a deep clean and 2952664 was uninstalled (superseded). while this was going on I was making the july iso and I included 2952664 (a #2 position). WTK failed on IE11 (but I get that now and then, still don't know why). I removed 2952664 and everything went 100%. Just curious why my system called for 2952664. its win 7_64 home premium. regards...
  3. From memory ( I'm out to dinner now) my latest may iso on vm deep clean was kb2534111 Regards...
  4. Thiersee UNDERSTOOD. however in the re-loaded may 13 UL's the kb3210131 is in the main category of convenience updates (44 of them). If we using the English version do we have to go into that main category and "uncheck" kb3210131. Usually you check the category you need and you're ready to DL. What if we forget and it gets installed? Will it cause us any problems? regards...
  5. I'm trying to keep up with your discussion with thiersee. You say you have re-uploaded the may UL's. is this kb3210131 necessary (or not) if using convenience method and IE11 English version? regards...
  6. I was going to use nfw 4.7 by ricktendo but it seems that is optional. As discussed kb4019990 would have to be included in the new UL's at least for now and that is not considered a M$ update. Looks like we will still be using NFW 4.62 and if anyone wants to "upgrade" it will be at their discretion. I assume eventually NFW 4.7 will work its way into our UL's. Please correct me if I misunderstand. regards... regards...
  7. FYI, On my home computer kb2987107 just requested, and successfully installed. regards...
  8. with thiersee's help the correct placement of kb4019990 should be the last msu on the integration list (convenience) right before IE11. It should be renamed 4-windows6.1-KB4019990-x64.msu regards...
  9. 1) the difference to #3 is that I did not use kb4019990 at all in my first attempt. Sorry I forgot to mention that. 2) since kb3125574 hangs without kb4019990 being integrated anywhere, then making it 4-kb4019990 and integrating after kb3125574 should not correct kb3125574 from hanging, in my opinion. 3) yes I agree, since that worked for me. btw, the iso was created successfully and nfw 4.7 is listed in programs and features. its size is 1 gb. In WU I have 5 updates to be installed. strangely WU has kb2603229 and kb3046269 listed even though they were listed in my silents. The other 3 updates are 3 that are expected, 30008923 and mrt, defender. I just installed them and all 5 got installed successfully so they were all needed. I just did another check and now WU wants kb3177467 installed. What happened is those 3 updates did not get installed from silent, when placing kb4019990 after them and before kb2685811, kb2685813. to repeat my silent list was in this sequence: 2603229, 3177467, 3046269, 4019990, 2685811, 2685813. I am wondering what the sequence will be when the may monthly quality file comes out tomorrow if using nfw 4.7. will we be integrating kb4019990 in the new UL's? if so will its place with the other updates matter or should it go in the silents and then where in the silents? regards
  10. here is my latest experience with ricktendo's nfw 4.7. If I integrate nfw 4.7 via the silent then kb3125574 hangs up and does not get installed, have to end WTK. If I put kb4019990 as 2-kb4019990 and have it integrate right before kb3125574 then kb3125574 gets integrated but my IE11 integration fails. if I put kb4019990 in the silent ahead of nfw 4.7 then everything works... making an iso now to test on vm. regards...
  11. same here, kb3008923 just installed. I see ricktendo's page has the new NFW 4.7 ready for DL (Thiersee TY for sending it to me prematurely), but ricktendo still has the wrong year on the file date. he's using 2016 instead of 2017. was wondering how we can get him to change that. could be confusing to new users. regards...
  12. yes Thiersee has fixed my issue of the IE welcome screen starting all the time. As he states above>>>> in the internet explorer tweaks section of WTK check the box "disable first run customize." thx Thiersee for your time. you're a genius! regards...
  13. I understand. however when I do NOT use my registry tweak this is what happens on VM. I open IE11 for the first time. I get the choice to choose msn or google. I make my choice, google. I then get a screen to choose recommended settings which I do. Then I open IE11 again and I get my home page which is google and a second page opens with an address of https://mybrowser.microsoft.com/iewelcome/v2?bpa=1 and that's what opens every time I use IE11, google and that page. If I was to RT. click on the IE icon in the taskbar while these 2 screens are open then only another google page will open (not 2). Very frustrating and I'm very surprised I am the only one reporting this. I'm using the same WTK, IE update (if English) and other updates as everyone else. Thiersee is helping me behind the scenes and may have some information. he is experimenting with the English version. I'll report back. regards...
  14. Thiersee my autounattend.xml is attached. thx regards... Autounattend.xml
  15. rhahgleuhargh just curious. IE8 is built-in to win 7. So if you do not integrate ie11 into your project then WU will eventually update ie8 to ie11. correct? I understand you don't use it but is that the way you do it? you don't integrate ie11? or you do integrate ie11 but then you never use it. you use just firefox? regards...