Jump to content
niTe_RiDeR_Pr0

[Bug] Setting priority of DISM doesn't work

Recommended Posts

Hi Lego,

I set the priority of dism & external apps high, as shown in the screenshot.

But after start applying in the aio integrator, I just checked the priority of dism. Its normal!

wintoolkit ver 1.5.3.9; dism (system) version 6.1.7600.16385; dism (installed) version: 6.3.9600.16384

Please fix.

 

I found out one more thing: for mount and unmount, wintoolkit doesn't use dism. It uses ImageX. So why is it written that the process that require dism is mount & unmount (as shown in below screenshot)? Till now in any version (from 1.4, I started using wintoolkit from version 1.4.x.x), I haven't seen usage of dism in the mount & unmount. I have seen that its used by wintoolkit for integration (servicing).

 

Thank you.

 

Screenshots:

 

N67r1M7.png

Edited by niTe_RiDeR_Pro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Alejandro Almeida
      Nothing appears to select! 

    • By ZERO_XP
      When i try to import a custom registry setting (saved into a .reg file) into the "tweaks" section in the "All in one Intergrator" every thing works fine however then when i install finish installing my custom made windows 7 SP1 
      I check the registry and the settings are not applied inside my custom windows 7
      I'm also able to replicate this on the WIM registry editor and and on all Wintoolkit V1.5.4.X
    • By hkroiss
      Hi, since around 1.5 half years i am integrating Updates into our Windows Image at our Company. However i have noticed that even when all the latest Updates are integrated after installing the OS it shows a few ".NET Framework" Updates that couldn't be integrated (see Attachment). A year ago it were only around 10, now around 15. So its getting more and more, it hinders the usfulness of the Slipstreaming process a bit.
      Did anyone of you find a way to integrate this pesky ".NET" Updates into the Image?
      Thanks for the help.

    • By f483755
      ...since the home server(?) at http://testing.wintoolkit.co.uk/ is down, or acting weird, quite often. And it again. And it appears that no one else mirrors your 0.56MB application anywhere, ever. Currently, all your links are broken, and I've been hunting all over the internet for the last three hours for a way to find it. In fact, this is a big enough issue that the fourth of four Google results for "2.0.5860.25216.7z" is a pretty damn convincing, and extremely nasty malware trap: http://solari.victus-rpg.com/showthread.php?tid=84314 . I just spent the last 45 minutes wrestling control of my computer back from that beast. The only other v2.x one can find on the internet is at http://www.datafilehost.com/d/2b73ce8b, which was uploaded in another wincert.net thread a few months back when a similar thing was happening, but it is the older 2.0.5651.42757, which no longer runs due to a built-in expiration date.
      So, yeah. A mirror would be good; and in the mean time, anyone have a copy of 2.0.5860.25216.7z laying around?
      Thanks, your friend,
      Geoff (or, I guess, "f483755" today)
      Sunday 17th January 2011 2:18pm
    • By Guppy
      Good evening everyone!
       
      I've been using WinToolkit since a lot of years to integrate updates in Windows Installations. Recently I redid my Win7 x64 Installation. I removed the ei.cfg and integrated all major "General" "Security" and "Hotfix" Updates. After integrating I created an ISO and started it in a virtual Machine. But upon booting it only says 
       
      CDBOOT: COULDN´T FIND BOOTMGR
       
      I don't know what the problem is, especially since my x86 Version started without any issues and in the past there was nothing comparable. Can you tell me what might have went wrong and how I can fix this? 
       
      Thank you for all suggestions in advance and have a nice day!
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...