Thiersee

Same here with Cyberfox 34.0.5. But SOMETIMES it is necessary, for me, to use a download-manager (I use FDM); I don't know why only sometimes. Happy New Year to everybody Thiersee

Hi Lego, check your bank-account (starting on wednesday) . Thiersee

Hi mooms, 1) In the english batch-file there is a small section still in french: 2) If I start the maker on a system, where the actual version is already installed, I get a small error-warning that a newer version is already installed on the system; this warning disappears on his own. Regards, Thiersee BTW: Happy New Year! :beerchug:

Hi trash491, "Silent switches" are marked as "Not needed", not the KB itself! Thiersee P.S.: Buon Anno Nuovo!

Hi rulman, are you in the right forum ? Anyway: KB3004394 has been taken from update-server, because it was causing problems KB2993651 has been replaced by a newer version (6.1.1.2 by 6.1.1.3, the update after this in the list) KB3000988 has been replaced by KB3008627 Thiersee

I see the picture !

Hi Lego, what does it mean? It appears on every WTK-Start. Thiersee

Yes; I tought too (post #362) that an installed KB3008923 is a prerequisite for KB3025390. It has been integrated and installed; it means it's not right, what MS says in the KB-article. Thiersee

Just tested integration/installation W7 HomePremium x86 (VirtualBox): neither KB976002 (browser choice) nor KB3025390 have been asked again by WU! Thiersee

Yes, sir!

No problem at all! Thiersee

It seems that KB976002 (Browser choice) is not necessary anymore, the KB has taken from MS-Update-Catalog! The 5 years limit from the EU are over! I've only an article in german, sorry! Or Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrowserChoice.eu Thiersee

@rhahgleuhargh I did a test (HomePremium x64, italian): without KB3008923 (uninstalled, not a new installation!) WU does NOT ask for KB3025390, then I installed KB3008923 again and WU asked again for KB3025390. Regards, Thiersee

It could be, that this update can NOT be integrated, because you need KB3008923 installed! Integrated update have the state "Install pending" after integration with WTK; may be you must put it into RunOnce. Regards, Thiersee

rvkroots.exe /Q. Thiersee

http://forums.mydigitallife.info/threads/19461-Windows-7-Hotfix-repository/page971 Thiersee

Link is still the old one! Thiersee

Normally WU asks for KB976932 SP1 with that size if KB2533552 has NOT been installed; after installing it disappears SP1 too. Google Translate : Normalement WU demande KB976932 SP1 avec cette taille si KB2533552 ne est PAS installé; après l'installation de SP1 il disparaît aussi.

Yes, I did it and yes, kb3006625 has been uninstalled (superseded). BTW, but nothing to do with this and with the ULs: the MS "never ending story" continues: Silverlight-update (taken from server the day after patch-day) has been asked again (higher version) by WU...... Thiersee

Hi rhahgleuhargh, I give up with KB3006625, I put it again in the UL! I installed now three times always with the same result: 1) Install with only UL-updates but without KB3006625, with IE11 and RDP; restart, WU-search, it asks obviously for KB3006625 2) One after the other (and for each every time restart and a new search!) all the KBs from WU and from my list I install with WPI (KBs and system-related programs): WU asks always for KB 3006625. 3) Install like point 1) and then my whole list with WPI: WU does NOT ask for KB3006625 anymore! As I said, I give up, I can't find The reason: my be the sequence or a program, I don't know . Thiersee

Some of he link-descriptions on the site are wrong! 1st link NOT W7 x86 ------> Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 for Itanium-based Systems (KB3024777) 2nd link NOT W7 x64 ------> Update for Windows 7 (KB3024777) 3rd link OK W7/Server 2008 R2 ------> Update for Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems (KB3024777) Thiersee

Exactly this caused my mistake ... for x64: KB2533552 KB2603229 KB2685811 KB2685813 KB2506143 KB2809215 KB2809900 KB2823180 for x86: KB2533552 KB2685811 KB2685813 KB2506143 KB2809900 KB2823180 After installing this updates WU does not ask for KB3006625. Thiersee

Hi rhahgleuhargh, First point: I have a very strange issue with WUD and the ULs 30-11-2014 and 09-12-2014 for both architecture: I can NOT load the four lists at the same time, the one overwrites the other! I explain exactly (I hope): I load for example both list for the 30-11-2014 and they appear in WUD; after that I load both lists for the 09-12-2014 and they appear in WUD, but the the others from 30-11-2014 DISAPPEAR! If I load "crosswise", i.e. x64 from 30-11-2014 and x86 from 09-12-2014 no problem; with older list (11-11-2014 and 18-11-2014) no isssues! I unpacked all four lists and opened with Notepad++ to compare the contents I read at min 10 times the lists, but I did not find any error. 2nd point (not an error!) KB3006625: have you read my post #317? I've just finished an installation (real HW, x64) with all my not integratable KBs and again WU did NOT ask for this update! If I install with only the update from the UL, WU asks for it. Thiersee Edit: first point: MY FAULT ! Thiersee

To my post #305: Forget this point, please! On my 2 working PCs this request does not appear, probably due to other Updates/programs installed. If I make a fresh installation with only the updates from the UL (Windows, IE11, RDP) and make then an update-search, KB3006625 appears as "important", in the same way like SP1 (a small part) if KB2533552 has not been installed. With a complete installation with all the non integratable updates, driver, programs and so on KB3006625 is NOT requested by WU. The issue with KB3004394 remains. Thiersee

This is the best idea! Thiersee