Jump to content

KB2533552 Direct Integration


aquilotto

Recommended Posts

KB2533552 x86 - x64
This is not a real addon. I have modded hotfixes, in order to directly integrate them in Windows 7 iso.
So you can obtain a full post-SP1 Windows iso, integrating all hotfixes needed.
You can find my complete download list here
It's in italian language, but, as you known, hotfixes are international.
All you need is your language pack for IE 11.
Using Win Toolkit, you have to uncheck "Failed Updates to Silent Installers" and "Move known Problem Updates to Silent Installers" in "Options" Tab, before adding updates.

Edited by aquilotto
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non è possibile integrare KB2533552!

Anche se l'integrazione funziona, dopo l'installazione KB2533552 viene richiesto da Windows Update come necessario e critico!

 

You CAN NOT integrate KB2533552!

Even if the integration works, after installation Windows Update request thi update as necessary and critical!

 

Regards, Thiersee

 

Edit:

Sorry for asking, I saw later you have modded the KB: after installation does WindowsUpdate NOT ask for this update?

Edited by Thiersee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB2533552 x86 - x64

This is not a real addon. I have modded hotfixes, in order to directly integrate them in Windows 7 iso.

.......

Using Win Toolkit, you have to uncheck "Failed Updates to Silent Installers" and "Move known Problem Updates to Silent Installers" in "Options" Tab, before adding updates.

I've just tested this modded KB (VirtualBox, German, HP-x86) and it works!

No requests from WU for KB2533552 (+ a part of SP1).

 

Thiersee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modifying update.mum file will result later in failed integrity check, specially when using System Update Readiness Tool or checking "Installed updates" in control panel

Indeed:

Windows Update is asking again for System Update Readiness Tool and KB2533552 does not appear in the list of installed updates;

but trying to install KB2533552 again (the "normal" not the modded) lets Windows say "Update already installed".

 

Thiersee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

abbodi, what you say is true, hotfixes don't appear in "installed updates", but it doesn't seem important to me. In fact, checking files installed with the original .msu file and those installed with the modded .cab file, I found that they are equivalent.
x86 version was easiest; I took inspiration in ArnisLav's post on MSFN board. He suggested to change allowedOffline="false" to allowedOffline="true" in "update.mum", but this change corrupted installation. Then I looked in .mum file and I noticed that "exclusive="true"" could be responsable of failure. Changing "exclusive="true" allowedOffline="false"" with "exclusive="false" allowedOffline="true", it worked fine!
x64 version was hard to mod; the simply "exclusive="false" allowedOffline="true" was not enough. I had gotten stuck, until I found dism.log file. Then, analizing it, I was able to find errors and I reconstructed a working hotfix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes i know the files are the same and the modded cab will give functional servicing stack :)

 

for modded or lited editions/aio this is not a problem 

but for users whou care about updates or WU, this would be a problem

MS made that update exclusive for a reason :)

 

there is a workaround for this issue, by replacing the altered mum/manifest files with the original ones after integrating the update

but that would require RunasSystem/RunFromToken to be able to replace the files without changing permissions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi abbodi, there is no need to mod any manifest file.

I reconstructed "amd64_microsoft-windows-servicingstack...manifest" and "package_2_for_kb2533552~amd64~...mum" due to an error of Cab Tool (included in OnePiece's DXTool); this one doesn't extract above files . I wasted a long time trying to find a solution (argh!).

After I used command line “extract”,  all files were correctly unpacked.

At this point, you need only to switch “True” and “False” in “update.mum” and it’s all right, also in x64 version.

The reason of lacking in “Installed Updates” is still unknown.

I supposed that “_manifest_.cix.xml” may be responsable, but I haven’t  found a solution yet.

I’m counting on you to sort this issue out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually the reason is known :)

 

each .mum file is paired with security .cat file to verify the contents

modifying mum file cause the failed integrity check

 

“Installed Updates” scans packages mum files in \Windows\servicing\Packages

and make a cache database for it in \Windows\WinSxS\ManifestCache

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@abbodi1406,

 

And the reason we can't update the security .cat file to match the modified .mum file is because ... ?  If it's a signing issue I might be able to point you to a way you can sign the file to pass all MS security checks for signed files.  If it would be better to do as you suggested and replace "the altered mum/manifest files with the original ones after integrating the update", I thought I saw a way to do that over at MSFN, but I could be wrong.  Not that i see this as a huge problem to have to install this update after OS install, but it is a minor inconvenience.

 

Cheers and Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know anything about signing or security cats :D

 

replacing mum files is not a problem

can be done with modifying the permissions (not recommended)

or using cmd with trustedinstaller token

or having the original files inside a wim file which preserve the nt security permissions, therefore can by applied using dism/imagex

 

but like you said, install this update after OS install is not a big deal :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
  • 1 year later...
:AddPackageKB2533552
set KB2533552=!APP_HOME!\Updates\SpecialUpdates\KB976932\Windows6.1-KB2533552-!OS_ARCHITECTURE!.cab
mkdir "%temp%\KB2533552"
expand -F:* "!KB2533552!" "%temp%\KB2533552"
copy "%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum" "%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum.bak"
cscript "%APP_HOME%\SourceCode\Common\Utils\replace.vbs" "%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum"
for /d %%c in (!WimIndexNo!) DO (!DISM! /Image:"!WimMountDir!\%%c" /add-package /packagepath:"%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum" /ignorecheck /NoRestart)
set SRC="%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum.bak"
for /d %%c in (!WimIndexNo!) DO (set DST=!WimMountDir!\%%c\Windows\servicing\Packages\Package_for_KB2533552~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.1.1.1.mum)
takeown /F "%DST%" /A
icacls "%DST%" /grant Administrators:F
copy "%SRC%" "%DST%"
icacls "%DST%" /setowner "NT SERVICE\TrustedInstaller"
icacls "%DST%" /grant:r Administrators:RX
call :ADD_UPDATE_ERROR_FIX
rd /s /q "%temp%\KB2533552" >nul 2>&1
goto :EOF


:ADD_UPDATE_ERROR_FIX
set "SetACL=%APP_HOME%\Bin\%PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE%\SetACL.exe"
for /d %%c in (!WimIndexNo!) DO (
	reg load HKLM\TempSoftware !WimMountDir!\%%c\Windows\System32\config\SOFTWARE
	%SetACL% -on "HKLM\TempSoftware\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\SessionsPending" -ot reg -actn setowner -ownr n:Administrators
	%SetACL% -on "HKLM\TempSoftware\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\SessionsPending" -ot reg -actn ace -ace n:Administrators;p:full
	reg add "HKLM\TempSoftware\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\SessionsPending" /v Exclusive /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f
	reg unload HKLM\TempSoftware
)
goto :EOF

this is part of my code ,You can't run it directly,for reference only,wish it can help you.

Edited by DeanMao
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi K4sum1, KB2533552 is a very old Servicing Stack (2011), which has been replaced by KB4490628 for ordinary updates and by KB5034865 for ESU updates.
My KB2533552, unfortunately, causes Windows Features corruption.
I recommend you hide KB976932, which is actually KB2533552.
If you want to integrate it anyway, I recommend using UpdatePack7R2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did my own manual edit type thing and it seems to work. Having that update there bothers me. Although what exactly do you mean by Windows Features corruption?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...