aquilotto Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 (edited) KB2533552 x86 - x64This is not a real addon. I have modded hotfixes, in order to directly integrate them in Windows 7 iso.So you can obtain a full post-SP1 Windows iso, integrating all hotfixes needed.You can find my complete download list hereIt's in italian language, but, as you known, hotfixes are international.All you need is your language pack for IE 11.Using Win Toolkit, you have to uncheck "Failed Updates to Silent Installers" and "Move known Problem Updates to Silent Installers" in "Options" Tab, before adding updates. Edited December 16, 2015 by aquilotto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiersee Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 (edited) Non è possibile integrare KB2533552!Anche se l'integrazione funziona, dopo l'installazione KB2533552 viene richiesto da Windows Update come necessario e critico! You CAN NOT integrate KB2533552!Even if the integration works, after installation Windows Update request thi update as necessary and critical! Regards, Thiersee Edit:Sorry for asking, I saw later you have modded the KB: after installation does WindowsUpdate NOT ask for this update? Edited January 31, 2015 by Thiersee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiersee Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 KB2533552 x86 - x64This is not a real addon. I have modded hotfixes, in order to directly integrate them in Windows 7 iso........Using Win Toolkit, you have to uncheck "Failed Updates to Silent Installers" and "Move known Problem Updates to Silent Installers" in "Options" Tab, before adding updates.I've just tested this modded KB (VirtualBox, German, HP-x86) and it works!No requests from WU for KB2533552 (+ a part of SP1). Thiersee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquilotto Posted February 1, 2015 Author Share Posted February 1, 2015 These modded hotfixes work perfectly (both x86 and x64), I am absolutely sure.Mostly x64 version required very hard work. :weakbench: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooms Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Could you explain how you have modded them ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abbodi1406 Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Modifying update.mum file will result later in failed integrity check, specially when using System Update Readiness Tool or checking "Installed updates" in control panel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiersee Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Modifying update.mum file will result later in failed integrity check, specially when using System Update Readiness Tool or checking "Installed updates" in control panelIndeed:Windows Update is asking again for System Update Readiness Tool and KB2533552 does not appear in the list of installed updates;but trying to install KB2533552 again (the "normal" not the modded) lets Windows say "Update already installed". Thiersee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquilotto Posted February 1, 2015 Author Share Posted February 1, 2015 abbodi, what you say is true, hotfixes don't appear in "installed updates", but it doesn't seem important to me. In fact, checking files installed with the original .msu file and those installed with the modded .cab file, I found that they are equivalent.x86 version was easiest; I took inspiration in ArnisLav's post on MSFN board. He suggested to change allowedOffline="false" to allowedOffline="true" in "update.mum", but this change corrupted installation. Then I looked in .mum file and I noticed that "exclusive="true"" could be responsable of failure. Changing "exclusive="true" allowedOffline="false"" with "exclusive="false" allowedOffline="true", it worked fine!x64 version was hard to mod; the simply "exclusive="false" allowedOffline="true" was not enough. I had gotten stuck, until I found dism.log file. Then, analizing it, I was able to find errors and I reconstructed a working hotfix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abbodi1406 Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Yes i know the files are the same and the modded cab will give functional servicing stack for modded or lited editions/aio this is not a problem but for users whou care about updates or WU, this would be a problemMS made that update exclusive for a reason there is a workaround for this issue, by replacing the altered mum/manifest files with the original ones after integrating the updatebut that would require RunasSystem/RunFromToken to be able to replace the files without changing permissions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquilotto Posted February 8, 2015 Author Share Posted February 8, 2015 Hi abbodi, there is no need to mod any manifest file.I reconstructed "amd64_microsoft-windows-servicingstack...manifest" and "package_2_for_kb2533552~amd64~...mum" due to an error of Cab Tool (included in OnePiece's DXTool); this one doesn't extract above files . I wasted a long time trying to find a solution (argh!).After I used command line “extract”, all files were correctly unpacked.At this point, you need only to switch “True” and “False” in “update.mum” and it’s all right, also in x64 version.The reason of lacking in “Installed Updates” is still unknown.I supposed that “_manifest_.cix.xml” may be responsable, but I haven’t found a solution yet.I’m counting on you to sort this issue out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abbodi1406 Posted February 11, 2015 Share Posted February 11, 2015 Actually the reason is known each .mum file is paired with security .cat file to verify the contentsmodifying mum file cause the failed integrity check “Installed Updates” scans packages mum files in \Windows\servicing\Packagesand make a cache database for it in \Windows\WinSxS\ManifestCache Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bphlpt Posted February 11, 2015 Share Posted February 11, 2015 @abbodi1406, And the reason we can't update the security .cat file to match the modified .mum file is because ... ? If it's a signing issue I might be able to point you to a way you can sign the file to pass all MS security checks for signed files. If it would be better to do as you suggested and replace "the altered mum/manifest files with the original ones after integrating the update", I thought I saw a way to do that over at MSFN, but I could be wrong. Not that i see this as a huge problem to have to install this update after OS install, but it is a minor inconvenience. Cheers and Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abbodi1406 Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I don't know anything about signing or security cats replacing mum files is not a problemcan be done with modifying the permissions (not recommended)or using cmd with trustedinstaller tokenor having the original files inside a wim file which preserve the nt security permissions, therefore can by applied using dism/imagex but like you said, install this update after OS install is not a big deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougiefresh2 Posted June 27, 2018 Share Posted June 27, 2018 (edited) Sorry to bump such an old topic, but here's a script and instruction on this: How to integrate KB2533552, KB3046269 and KB3177467 in Win7 offline Edited June 27, 2018 by dougiefresh2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanMao Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 (edited) :AddPackageKB2533552 set KB2533552=!APP_HOME!\Updates\SpecialUpdates\KB976932\Windows6.1-KB2533552-!OS_ARCHITECTURE!.cab mkdir "%temp%\KB2533552" expand -F:* "!KB2533552!" "%temp%\KB2533552" copy "%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum" "%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum.bak" cscript "%APP_HOME%\SourceCode\Common\Utils\replace.vbs" "%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum" for /d %%c in (!WimIndexNo!) DO (!DISM! /Image:"!WimMountDir!\%%c" /add-package /packagepath:"%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum" /ignorecheck /NoRestart) set SRC="%temp%\KB2533552\update.mum.bak" for /d %%c in (!WimIndexNo!) DO (set DST=!WimMountDir!\%%c\Windows\servicing\Packages\Package_for_KB2533552~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.1.1.1.mum) takeown /F "%DST%" /A icacls "%DST%" /grant Administrators:F copy "%SRC%" "%DST%" icacls "%DST%" /setowner "NT SERVICE\TrustedInstaller" icacls "%DST%" /grant:r Administrators:RX call :ADD_UPDATE_ERROR_FIX rd /s /q "%temp%\KB2533552" >nul 2>&1 goto :EOF :ADD_UPDATE_ERROR_FIX set "SetACL=%APP_HOME%\Bin\%PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE%\SetACL.exe" for /d %%c in (!WimIndexNo!) DO ( reg load HKLM\TempSoftware !WimMountDir!\%%c\Windows\System32\config\SOFTWARE %SetACL% -on "HKLM\TempSoftware\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\SessionsPending" -ot reg -actn setowner -ownr n:Administrators %SetACL% -on "HKLM\TempSoftware\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\SessionsPending" -ot reg -actn ace -ace n:Administrators;p:full reg add "HKLM\TempSoftware\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\SessionsPending" /v Exclusive /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f reg unload HKLM\TempSoftware ) goto :EOF this is part of my code ,You can't run it directly,for reference only,wish it can help you. Edited October 25, 2019 by DeanMao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4sum1 Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 Does anyone have the modified cab file for x64? The link doesn't work anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquilotto Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 Hi K4sum1, KB2533552 is a very old Servicing Stack (2011), which has been replaced by KB4490628 for ordinary updates and by KB5034865 for ESU updates. My KB2533552, unfortunately, causes Windows Features corruption. I recommend you hide KB976932, which is actually KB2533552. If you want to integrate it anyway, I recommend using UpdatePack7R2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4sum1 Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 I did my own manual edit type thing and it seems to work. Having that update there bothers me. Although what exactly do you mean by Windows Features corruption? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquilotto Posted May 11 Author Share Posted May 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4sum1 Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Works on my machine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquilotto Posted May 11 Author Share Posted May 11 Well! Can you attach your update.mum ? Have you integrated KB2533552 before KB4490628 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4sum1 Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Have the entire update and integrate script I made https://files.catbox.moe/9wglwu.7z Yes, it's the very first update I integrate in my list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooms Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Why not using Simplix Update Pack, as suggested ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4sum1 Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 I'm insane and I don't trust it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.