Kees030 Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Thanks for the update. Please check MD5; I've downloaded 5 times and keep on getting wrong hash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted November 25, 2009 Author Share Posted November 25, 2009 Sorry I repacked with greater compression and forgot to change the md5 kiki burgh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kees030 Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 No problem, appreciate your work :thumbsup_anim: Hash is OK now; might save others unnecessary redownloads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunetu Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Hi again KelI don't know about these VC++ Runtime issues... I installed AutoItRecorder after installing AutoIt (I forgot the standalone SciTe had the better recorder separately and it seems AutoItRecorder placed an exe in the start menu instead of a shortcut. Until I realised it, I kept getting errors when starting it "msvcp71d.dll" (or something like that) is missing. Of course, all 7.1d dlls are missing. It seems they are updates to the VC++ 2003 Runtime (newer dlls). I started the program from where it installed and it worked because the dlls were there with the executable. Problem is, maybe I just figured out why the two who posted here have had problems with software needing "VC++ 2005 SP1 runtimes" even though your pack was installed. Maybe they are wrong and it was 2003 version of the runtime. I checked out MS website and there's no pack for those runtimes, each application has to take care of copying them to a handy location. Now, would you be nice and add those if they are newer ? Maybe that will solve people's issues. I've only found the files on dll download websites.Now the more important reason I'm posting: could you tell me how to slim down the pack to be suitable for installing on Windows XP Service Pack 3 Professional ? As you said, many runtimes are already included with the OS.Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newsposter Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Brunetu, make that "many OBSOLETE runtimes are already included".The point of the pack is to make a more complete runtime installation AND to create a more UP TO DATE installation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunetu Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Brunetu, make that "many OBSOLETE runtimes are already included".The point of the pack is to make a more complete runtime installation AND to create a more UP TO DATE installation.I don't mind that, I'd just want to be able to remove some of the dlls, the pack has gotten quite big . Anyway, my XP USB install is almost exactly 1GB but smaller so it still fits. I was just asking because I saw that Kel answered to someone that he would make a smaller pack available for XP, maybe not public or not here. I don't think a separate pack for XP would bother anyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiki burgh Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 hi brunetu! i'm not sure exactly what you meant by slimmed pack (like which contents would be retained or taken out) ... but you could try checking this 1 out: [Release] Microsoft Runtime Libraries 1.4.8 (32-bit) by code65536 ... although this was last edited by the maker on Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:51 am. as it stands, kel's work has all these & then some. there's another one that you might want take a look at too: RogueSpear's Runtime Collection thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunetu Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 (edited) I was refering to removing dlls that are already included in XP SP3 Pro which I don't need because the pack has gotten quite large already, so I guess one can say slimmed down Thanks for directions, I'll check them out, but I think I'm going to stick with Kel's pack, I trust his work. Thing is, I haven't done inf installers and it would be hard for me to tell which lines I have to remove. Edited November 26, 2009 by brunetu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted November 26, 2009 Author Share Posted November 26, 2009 Hey bruneto!Only 1 dll is on a sp3 disk afaik...Thats usp10.dll and you SHOULD really keep that one.As for sliiming it down? Yeah you could but it would be a pick and choose deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunetu Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 Hi Kel,It was you the one who said that more recent visual basic runtimes were already included in XP, right ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted November 26, 2009 Author Share Posted November 26, 2009 Yeah for vb 5&6 thats why they are not in there.I had included them at one time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunetu Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 OK then, the size is just fine. No tweaking needed. Thanks a lot for everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiki burgh Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 (edited) hi kel! hope you don't mind if i move over our conversation here. maybe other readers could pick something from this.... .cats actually exist in a couple of the asms folders.FIX you ask?Remove the asms folder from my runtimes and manually drop it into the I386 folder. i'll do that ... but doesn't i386 already have an asms directory? although looking at the asms in your cab, these are labeled 80-90. thanks kel! ... when i used Kels_Runtimes_addon_v2.6.6.CAB (this also had an asms directory: 80), it worked ...hi kel! checking on asms directory, i believe it could accommodate the new sub directories from your runtime (since the ones i see are labeled 60, 70 then skips to 1000). however, if i enabled asms compression via nLite, would this have any effect on successfully putting the 80 & 90 subs? thanks!edit: just checked on the result of integration ... i think pretty much it was handled successfully since i now see asms sub-directories 60, 70, 80, 90. isn't this a good indicator? thanks again. Edited November 30, 2009 by kiki burgh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
automizzer Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 Has the time come to update the pack with VC++ 2010 runtimes?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oguz Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 (edited) Yes, great idea! We are waiting for you to update the pack with VC++2010 runtimes! :thumbsup_anim: Edited April 24, 2010 by oguz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedexmonster Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 Yes, great idea! We are waiting for you to update the pack with VC++2010 runtimes! :thumbsup_anim:Visual C++ 2010 Runtimes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
user_hidden Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 has been updated over at RyanVM form to version 6.8Kels' Runtimes v6.8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oguz Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 Visual C++ 2010 RuntimesThanx for adress but i'm waiting kel's runtime packet because i'm waiting "unantendet" version visual c++ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted July 10, 2010 Author Share Posted July 10, 2010 oguz = I have updated the post here.What user_hidden meant was that I already updated this I just didn't update the page here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted March 23, 2011 Author Share Posted March 23, 2011 Updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oguz Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Updated.This is a very good decision. It made the system garbage to set up the same .dll files in two different packs. Congratulation! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 hiplease if you can add thishttp://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=23510 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted September 30, 2011 Author Share Posted September 30, 2011 @ mona:I really don't think that belongs in this pack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w64bit Posted October 6, 2011 Share Posted October 6, 2011 Hello,I found new files:OpenAL32.dll = 6.14.357.25wrap_oal.dll = 2.2.0.7libmmd.dll = 11.0.11.2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted October 6, 2011 Author Share Posted October 6, 2011 And please provide them for me... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.