Jump to content

[14 janvier 2020] Update list GDR pour Windows 7 SP1 x86/x64 (Fr-En-De-Es-It)


Recommended Posts

I have been behind in the last page(s) of posts and just want to insure that the November rollup does or doesn't affect my silent kb's. I have been creating win 7_64 home premium iso's. For October my silents included: kb 2533552, 2603229, 2685811, 2685813, 3046269, 3177467. I seem to remember that 2685811 &13 (nfw 3.51) updates when trying to integrate them with all the other updates, afterwards they were still being asked for by WU so I put them in the silent section and now no problems.

Does the November rollup affect any of my other silent kb's or should any new ones be added?

regards...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, abbodi1406 said:

.....

you don't need 3046269 if you use  3177467

....

Hi abbodi1406,

I integrate 3177467 as Silent-SFX and KB3046269 in the WPI-Session: is it still not necessary?

Quote

make sure you put 2533552, 3177467 to be installed first (before 2603229, 2685811, 2685813)

is this necessary too, even if I install them "online" (it mean in a WPI-Session)?

 

TNX, Thiersee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with WPI
KB3046269 is needed only if you integrate offline KB3125574 or kb3172605
but if you want to do that online, then KB3177467 is enough

yes, specially online, because both are exclusive updates and require no other pending updates
and i think 2685811, 2685813 could trigger the pending status
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Abbodi1406,

I integrate both KB3172605 and KB3125574 offline and KB3177467 as Silent-SFX in the same session, so it's needed (WU asks for it).

Quote

yes, specially online, because both are exclusive updates and require no other pending updates
and i think 2685811, 2685813 could trigger the pending status

OK, I'll change the sequence, even if I didn't have issues (until now).

Thiersee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Bonjour,

Ce 13 Dec, la KB3205402 Rollup pour .NET Framework est sortie et elle contient 1 msu et 3 ndp*.exe.
D'instinct et après mes premiers tests, il me semble que :
 - la KB3201131 (msu) concerne le DNF 3.5.1 natif de Windows 7 SP1.
 - la KB3205379 concerne le DNF 4.6.2 et donc je travaille dessus.
 - KB3210139 concerne probablement le DNF 4.5.2 et KB3210136le  DNF 4.6.1 et donc ont un intérêt limité..

Merci de vos retours.

@+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@rhahgleuhargh

New Updates:

KB3207752 (renamed IE11-KB3207752 because of WTK), replaces KB3197868; DeepCleaning uninstalls KB3164035 & KB3185911.

KB3205402, cumulative for all versions of .NET-FW; I used KB3210131 (for .NET-FW 3.5.1) & KB3205379 (for .NET-FW 4.6.2); DeepCleaning uninstalls KB3163245 & KB3188740.

VirtualBox x86, adapted working directory for Convenience RollUp: no issues & no further request by WU after install.

Thiersee

Edited by Thiersee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thiersee said:

@rhahgleuhargh

New Updates:

KB3207752 (renamed IE11-KB3207752 because of WTK), replaces KB3197868; DeepCleaning uninstalls KB3164035 & KB3185911.

KB3205402, cumulative for all versions of .NET-FW; I used KB3210131 (for .NET-FW 3.5.1) & KB3205379 (for .NET-FW 4.6.2); DeepCleaning uninstalls KB3163245 & KB3188740.

VirtualBox x86, adapted working directory for Convenience RollUp: no issues & no further request by WU after install.

Thiersee

Is it still necessary to include kb2685811 and kb2685813 in sfc with these newly released kb's?

regards...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@pennsylvaniaron

Your .INI would be helpful too!

I integrated last week both x86 & x64, HomePremium & Professional, Italian & German: NO problems at all!

Thiersee

BTW: if IE11 has a black "X" means it has not been installed; KB3207752 contains updates for IE11 and it means it can NOT install the updates for IE11....

Edited by Thiersee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried it and the reg mods are not it. been using them for 2 yrs. right now I'm just trying the pre req's and the ie11 and the 3207752 (to avoid waiting for all the updates to install) and keep getting a black x on ie 11. very frustrating. is it ok to do a fast update like that or does ie11 need pre req's of its own? I also downloaded ie11 again from wud. that file hasn't changed  so this is a dilemma. do the order of the updates matter? also ie11 should go first before 3207752, correct? any other suggestions? this is what happens when I skip a month of updates. I seem to mess things up, although the method seems straight forward month after month.

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Keygen.exe::D:\Win Toolkit\MBC\Keygen.exe;%SystemDrive%\users\public\desktop\Keygen.exe;True
Loader v.2.22.exe::D:\Win Toolkit\Loader v.2.22.exe;%SystemDrive%\users\public\desktop\Loader v.2.22.exe;True
Microsoft Toolkit 2.6.2.exe::D:\Win Toolkit\Microsoft Toolkit 2.6.2.exe;%SystemDrive%\users\public\desktop\Microsoft Toolkit 2.6.2.exe;True

:excl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what happened. I do not think I included the rdp (4 optional) files when I last made an iso in October. I included them this time for December and it seems that was causing my issue with IE11 (have no idea why). I removed the 4 RDP files and everything went smoothly and according to plan. after installing the dec. iso on VM the only new update (other than MRT and defender def) was 2813347. thanks to all who responded and made the ul list possible again.

regards...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • mooms pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...